Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Redmon v. Singletary

Redmon v. Singletary

731 So. 2d 825, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5663, 1999 WL 270428
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 5, 1999
DocketNo. 98-2451
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 731 So. 2d 825 (Redmon v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redmon v. Singletary, 731 So. 2d 825, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5663, 1999 WL 270428 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for habeas corpus relief without prejudice to defendant seeking further relief in the trial court. Defendant may raise any issues regarding the illegality of his sentences for violation of probation in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion.

Additionally, the trial court failed to check the box in defendant’s sentencing documents in case nos. 88-6940 and 89-706, to provide for credit for all time previously served with the Department of Corrections. Defendant should file a Rule 3.800 motion to permit the court to credit him with all time previously served in these cases.

Habeas denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davila v. State
903 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
731 So. 2d 825, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5663, 1999 WL 270428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redmon-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1999.