Redmon v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Redmon v. Singletary

731 So. 2d 825, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5663, 1999 WL 270428

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 1999·No. No. 98-2451·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for habeas corpus relief without prejudice to defendant seeking further relief in the trial court. Defendant may raise any issues regarding the illegality of his sentences for violation of probation in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion.

Additionally, the trial court failed to check the box in defendant’s sentencing documents in case nos. 88-6940 and 89-706, to provide for credit for all time previously served with the Department of Corrections. Defendant should file a Rule 3.800 motion to permit the court to credit him with all time previously served in these cases.

Habeas denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for habeas corpus relief without prejudice to defendant seeking further relief in the trial court. Defendant may raise any issues regarding the illegality of his sentences for violation of probation in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion.

Additionally, the trial court failed to check the box in defendant’s sentencing documents in case nos. 88-6940 and 89-706, to provide for credit for all time previously served with the Department of Corrections. Defendant should file a Rule 3.800 motion to permit the court to credit him with all time previously served in these cases.

Habeas denied.

Redmon v. Singletary, 731 So. 2d 825, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5663, 1999 WL 270428 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

731 So. 2d 825 (Redmon v. Singletary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related