Redman v. State of Florida
This text of Redman v. State of Florida (Redman v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-1947 _____________________________
MICHAEL REDMAN,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.
October 23, 2024
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293, 298 (Fla. 1977); Clarington v. State, 314 So. 3d 496, 509 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (Gordo, J., concurring in result only).
LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ William Hanlon of Hanlon Law, PA, Tampa; Brooke Elvington, Dunedin, for Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Redman v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redman-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.