Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Redman v. State

Redman v. State

425 So. 2d 131, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22260
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 29, 1982
DocketNo. 82-2260
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 425 So. 2d 131 (Redman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redman v. State, 425 So. 2d 131, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22260 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Redman appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Appellant’s motion was facially insufficient because it presented issues which were raised and disposed of on direct appeal. Such issues are not proper grounds for a post-conviction motion. Foster v. State, 400 So.2d 1, 4 (Fla.1981). The trial court acted correctly in denying appellant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850.

Affirmed.

HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph Redman v. Richard L. Dugger
866 F.2d 387 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
Cunningham v. Lynch-Davidson Motors, Inc.
425 So. 2d 131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
425 So. 2d 131, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redman-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.