Redman v. State
425 So. 2d 131, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22260
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1982·No. No. 82-2260·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
Joseph Redman appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Appellant’s motion was facially insufficient because it presented issues which were raised and disposed of on direct appeal. Such issues are not proper grounds for a post-conviction motion. Foster v. State, 400 So.2d 1, 4 (Fla.1981). The trial court acted correctly in denying appellant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Redman v. State, 425 So. 2d 131, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22260 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
425 So. 2d 131 (Redman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joseph Redman v. Richard L. Dugger
866 F.2d 387 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
Cunningham v. Lynch-Davidson Motors, Inc.
425 So. 2d 131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)