Redman v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations, Ohio Div. of Mines

645 N.E.2d 1259, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3442
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 1, 1995·No. 94-2284; Nos. 93APE12-1670 and 93APE12-1671·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The discretionary appeal is allowed on Propositions of Law II and IV only.

Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., would also allow the other propositions of law. Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would not allow the discretionary appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Redman v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations, Ohio Div. of Mines, 645 N.E.2d 1259, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3442 (Ohio 1995).

645 N.E.2d 1259 (Redman v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations, Ohio Div. of Mines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related