Redman v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations, Ohio Div. of Mines

645 N.E.2d 1259, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3442
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 1, 1995
Docket94-2284; Nos. 93APE12-1670 and 93APE12-1671
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 645 N.E.2d 1259 (Redman v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations, Ohio Div. of Mines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redman v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations, Ohio Div. of Mines, 645 N.E.2d 1259, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3442 (Ohio 1995).

Opinion

The discretionary appeal is allowed on Propositions of Law II and IV only.

Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., would also allow the other propositions of law. Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would not allow the discretionary appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
645 N.E.2d 1259, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redman-v-ohio-dept-of-indus-relations-ohio-div-of-mines-ohio-1995.