Redman & Rogers v. Resnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Redman & Rogers v. Resnick

20 A.D.2d 773, 247 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4199

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 773 (Redman & Rogers v. Resnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redman & Rogers v. Resnick, 20 A.D.2d 773, 247 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders, entered on March. 25, 1963 and August 12, 1963, denying appellant attorneys’ applications to establish a lien upon their clients’ cause of action for personal injuries are unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs .and disbursements to plaintiffs-respondents. In affirming we nevertheless hold, as contended by appellants, that if entitled otherwise to assert their lien it would not be restricted to a recovery upon the action they instituted (Matter of Lourie, 254 App. Div. 555; Morgan v. Drewry, S. A. R. L., 285 App. Div. 1). Appellants do not refute satisfactorily, however, the assertion by the female plaintiff that they were discharged by her husband prior to the commencement of the actions in either the Supreme Court or the Civil Court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Yalente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders, entered on March. 25, 1963 and August 12, 1963, denying appellant attorneys’ applications to establish a lien upon their clients’ cause of action for personal injuries are unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs .and disbursements to plaintiffs-respondents. In affirming we nevertheless hold, as contended by appellants, that if entitled otherwise to assert their lien it would not be restricted to a recovery upon the action they instituted (Matter of Lourie, 254 App. Div. 555; Morgan v. Drewry, S. A. R. L., 285 App. Div. 1). Appellants do not refute satisfactorily, however, the assertion by the female plaintiff that they were discharged by her husband prior to the commencement of the actions in either the Supreme Court or the Civil Court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Yalente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 773, 247 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redman-rogers-v-resnick-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack