Redlon v. Fish-Keck Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Redlon v. Fish-Keck Co.

54 P. 285, 7 Kan. App. 473, 1898 Kan. App. LEXIS 356

Court of Appeals of Kansas·Decided August 18, 1898·No. No. 229·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dennison, P. J. :

This action was legally pending in the district court of Crawford county. Charles B. Redlon was a necessary party to the full determination of the matters in controversy, and had been regularly served with summons and had entered his voluntary appearance' and filed his answer and cross-petition. The court erred in sustaining the motion and dismissing the action as against Charles B. Redlon.

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to overrule the motion to dismiss the action as to the defendant, Charles B. Redlon, and to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dennison, P. J. :

This action was legally pending in the district court of Crawford county. Charles B. Redlon was a necessary party to the full determination of the matters in controversy, and had been regularly served with summons and had entered his voluntary appearance' and filed his answer and cross-petition. The court erred in sustaining the motion and dismissing the action as against Charles B. Redlon.

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to overrule the motion to dismiss the action as to the defendant, Charles B. Redlon, and to grant a new trial.

Redlon v. Fish-Keck Co., 54 P. 285, 7 Kan. App. 473, 1898 Kan. App. LEXIS 356 (kanctapp 1898).

Pincite

54 P. 285 (Redlon v. Fish-Keck Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.