Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeders' Ass'n

377 N.W.2d 459, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1278
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 11, 1985·No. C4-85-179, C0-85-180·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitions for further review are granted for the limited purpose of considering the propriety of the remand to the trial court for a determination of comparative fault on issues of both fraud and negligence and the question of whether it was error to submit to the jury Vernon Rediske’s claim of negligence against Minnesota Valley Breeder’s Association and Maust. Other issues to which the petitions have been addressed will not be considered by the court. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeders' Ass'n, 377 N.W.2d 459, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1278 (Mich. 1985).

377 N.W.2d 459 (Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeders' Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rediske v. MINNESOTA VALLEY BREEDERS'ASS'N
377 N.W.2d 459 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1985)