Reding v. Texas & P. R. Co.
20 F. Cas. 397, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2880
Opinion
You had better wait until the pleadings are completed, so that what the defence really is can be seen, and whether there is in fact a defence arising under an act of congress; for the present purpose it is clearly sufficient that the affidavit should simply state that there is such a defence in the words of the act. The rest may be rejected as surplusage. Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reding v. Texas & P. R. Co., 20 F. Cas. 397, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2880 (circtedpa 1880).
20 F. Cas. 397 (Reding v. Texas & P. R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.