Redgrave v. Singer

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Redgrave v. Singer

120 F. 306, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5314

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided November 11, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

I am of the opinion that the improvement specified in the claim of the complainant’s patent (No., 603,738, granted to Montague Redgrave May 10, 1898, for an improvement in bagatelle boards) is destitute of patentable novelty, and; consequently that the claim is invalid. The reasons for this conclusion are so satisfactorily set forth in the decision of the examiners im chief of the patent office, of December 14, 1893, rejecting the application for the patent, in which I fully concur, that an independent-discussion would serve no useful purpose.

The bill is dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

I am of the opinion that the improvement specified in the claim of the complainant’s patent (No., 603,738, granted to Montague Redgrave May 10, 1898, for an improvement in bagatelle boards) is destitute of patentable novelty, and; consequently that the claim is invalid. The reasons for this conclusion are so satisfactorily set forth in the decision of the examiners im chief of the patent office, of December 14, 1893, rejecting the application for the patent, in which I fully concur, that an independent-discussion would serve no useful purpose.

The bill is dismissed, with costs.

Redgrave v. Singer, 120 F. 306, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5314 (circtsdny 1902).

Pincite

120 F. 306 (Redgrave v. Singer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related