Redford v. State
455 So. 2d 595, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1894, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14818
This text of 455 So. 2d 595 (Redford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Redford v. State, 455 So. 2d 595, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1894, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14818 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
The credibility of a defendant and the reasonableness of his explanation for his possession of recently stolen property (§ 812.022(2), Fla.Stat.) is a question of fact for the jury. Leslie v. State, 35 Fla. 171, 17 So. 555 (1895); Ridley v. State, 407 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). See also Teague v. State, 390 So.2d 405 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ridley v. State
407 So. 2d 1000 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Teague v. State
390 So. 2d 405 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Leslie v. State
35 Fla. 171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1895)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
455 So. 2d 595, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1894, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redford-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.