Redfield v. State

57 N.W. 986, 39 Neb. 192, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 11
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 6, 1894
DocketNo. 5895
StatusPublished

This text of 57 N.W. 986 (Redfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redfield v. State, 57 N.W. 986, 39 Neb. 192, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 11 (Neb. 1894).

Opinion

Ryan, C.

The plaintiff in error, a married man, was tried in the district court of Holt county and io and guilty of the crime of rape committed upon the person of Minnie Muesch. At the time the crime charged was committed the victim was of the age of fourteen years. The only question ar[193]*193gued in this court is that the evidence did not sustain the verdict. On behalf of the plaintiff in error the testimony was in proof of such a condition of drunkenness at the time of the alleged offense as to render physically impossible the crime charged. Probably owing to a limited knowledge'of the English language, the testimony of the prosecuting witness was given in guch terms as to preclude its reproduction in print, except, perhaps, in the brief for plaintiff in error, wherein it is given with great apparent gusto. This testimony, however, was straightforward and convincing, was corroborated by other evidence, the aggregate being amply sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 N.W. 986, 39 Neb. 192, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redfield-v-state-neb-1894.