Redfield v. Redfield
110 N.Y. 671
Opinion
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Huger, Oh. J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Redfield v. Redfield, 110 N.Y. 671 (N.Y. 1888).
110 N.Y. 671 (Redfield v. Redfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Franklin v. Kidd
87 Misc. 399 (New York Supreme Court, 1914)
Wilcox v. Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum
66 Misc. 253 (New York Supreme Court, 1910)
Hamilton v. Fleckenstein
118 A.D. 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Pringle v. . Burroughs
78 N.E. 150 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
Hall v. Wagner
111 A.D. 70 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Kelley v. . Buffalo Savings Bank
72 N.E. 995 (New York Court of Appeals, 1904)
Hoffmann v. Union Dime Savings Institution
95 A.D. 329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Putnam v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co.
87 A.D. 13 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Squire v. Greene
38 A.D. 431 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Walrath v. Abbott
32 N.Y.S. 596 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Traders' National Bank v. Parker
29 N.E. 1094 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Livingston v. Manhattan Railway Co.
27 Abb. N. Cas. 411 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1891)
Livingston v. Manhattan Railway Co.
17 N.Y.S. 486 (Superior Court of New York, 1891)
Wahl v. . Barnum
22 N.E. 280 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Morris v. Wells
7 N.Y.S. 61 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)