Redfield v. Redfield

440 N.W.2d 242, 232 Neb. 303, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 243
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMay 26, 1989
DocketNo. 88-436
StatusPublished

This text of 440 N.W.2d 242 (Redfield v. Redfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redfield v. Redfield, 440 N.W.2d 242, 232 Neb. 303, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 243 (Neb. 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner, Keith D. Redfield, appeals from the order of the district court placing temporary legal custody of the children in the district court and placing physical custody and [304]*304possession of the children with the respondent, Deborah S. Redfield.

As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. Grindle v. Grindle, 226 Neb. 807, 415 N.W.2d 150 (1987).

We find no abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grindle v. Grindle
415 N.W.2d 150 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
440 N.W.2d 242, 232 Neb. 303, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redfield-v-redfield-neb-1989.