Redfield v. Collopy

276 N.W. 158, 133 Neb. 546, 1937 Neb. LEXIS 91
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 19, 1937
DocketNo. 30097
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 276 N.W. 158 (Redfield v. Collopy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redfield v. Collopy, 276 N.W. 158, 133 Neb. 546, 1937 Neb. LEXIS 91 (Neb. 1937).

Opinion

Carter, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage on 120 acres of land in Scotts Bluff county. The property was sold under an order of sale pursuant to a decree of foreclosure for $1,650. From an order confirming this sale, defendants appeal.

The only question raised that requires consideration is whether the price for which the mortgaged property was sold was so grossly disproportionate to its value as to be unconscionable in a court of equity.

Defendants offered in evidence the affidavits of four witnesses who stated that the mortgaged real estate was of the value of $8,000. There is no evidence in the record disputing the value placed upon it by defendants’ witnesses. Under the undisputed evidence, the mortgaged real estate was sold for less than one-fourth its value. The rule applicable requires us to hold that the property sold for a price so low as to be clearly unconscionable. Filley v. Mancuso, ante, p. 538, 276 N. W. 157. The order confirming the sale is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Land Bank v. Miller
296 N.W. 748 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1941)
Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. Popham
290 N.W. 423 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 N.W. 158, 133 Neb. 546, 1937 Neb. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redfield-v-collopy-neb-1937.