Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Redeye v. Jones

Redeye v. Jones

154 A.D.2d 949, 546 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13134
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 6, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 154 A.D.2d 949 (Redeye v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redeye v. Jones, 154 A.D.2d 949, 546 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

[950]*950Motion to vacate dismissal of appeal denied. Memorandum: Where, as here, the filiation proceeding seeks support, the filiation order, which contains no provision for support, is not an order of disposition and is not appealable without permission (Matter of Jane PP. v Paul QQ., 64 NY2d 15). Present— Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jane PP. v. Paul QQ.
473 N.E.2d 257 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 A.D.2d 949, 546 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redeye-v-jones-nyappdiv-1989.