Rederi A/B Pulp v. Republic Chemical Corp.

274 F.2d 428
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 28, 1960
DocketNo. 99, Docket No. 25546
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 274 F.2d 428 (Rederi A/B Pulp v. Republic Chemical Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rederi A/B Pulp v. Republic Chemical Corp., 274 F.2d 428 (2d Cir. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant here, Republic Chemical Corporation, complains rather bitterly that it has been caught here in pincers between libelants’ claim of freight upon breach of its two contracts to ship super-phosphate fertilizer to Korea by libel-ants’ vessels and the impleaded respondent’s failure to honor commitments to furnish the shipments. But the questions presented are essentially those of fact: whether libelants and Republic completed negotiations for the contracts of carriage and what their provisions were; whether libelants were prepared to perform and Republic anticipatorily breached the contracts (an issue clearly raised by the facts pleaded); whether the impleaded respondent complied so far as it could with providing space for loading at its narrow pier in Baltimore under conditions well known to Republic; and whether there was waiver or estoppel upon which Republic could rely. Judge McGohey’s findings and conclusions against Republic and in favor of each of the other parties, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 161 F. [429]*429Supp. 726, are not erroneous, but find complete support in the record. Republic made the mistake of engaging vessels on terms profitable to it when it did not have a firm commitment from its supplier for the dates it had agreed to load and when it had full knowledge of the tight schedule to which its supplier was limited by virtue of the latter’s loading conditions. Republic took a business risk for profit and was defeated by the weather and other circumstances; it must stand its loss. We are content to affirm on Judge McGohey’s good decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rederi A/B Pulp v. Republic Chemical Corporation
274 F.2d 428 (Second Circuit, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 F.2d 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rederi-ab-pulp-v-republic-chemical-corp-ca2-1960.