Redeeming Love Christian Center v. State

275 A.D.2d 739, 713 N.Y.S.2d 483, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9257

Opinion

—In a claim to recover damages for the appropriation of real property, the claimant appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Patti, J.), dated July 23, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, is in its favor and against the State of New York in the sum of $335,441.09.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court’s determination of the value of the condemned parcel was within the range of the expert testimony (see, D’Angelo v State of New York, 253 AD2d 733). Thus, it was supported by the record. The trial court properly rejected the valuation of the claimant’s expert based upon a site allocation adjustment (see, Acme Theatres v State of New York, 26 NY2d 385). Florio, J. P., Luciano, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Redeeming Love Christian Center v. State, 275 A.D.2d 739, 713 N.Y.S.2d 483, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

275 A.D.2d 739 (Redeeming Love Christian Center v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Acme Theatres, Inc. v. State
258 N.E.2d 912 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)
D'Angelo v. State
253 A.D.2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)