Reddy v. State
This text of 97 F. App'x 767 (Reddy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Krishna Reddy appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of her action which sought to “unseat” President George W. Bush and Richard Cheney and to “seat” involuntary plaintiff-appellants Albert Gore and Joseph Lieberman as the democratically-elected Article II President and Vice President of the United States, and to obtain other equitable relief. We agree with the district court that Reddy lacks standing under Article III to bring this action. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 2136, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992).1
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 F. App'x 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reddy-v-state-ca9-2004.