Reddy v. Commonwealth
This text of 662 N.E.2d 212 (Reddy v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from the denial pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.), of relief from an interlocutory ruling denying Jason C. Reddy access to the psychological and medical records of the complainant’s mother. Supreme Judicial Court Rule 2:21 (2) requires an appellant to “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” The appellant has failed to set forth reasons why normal appellate review in the event of conviction is not an adequate remedy.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
662 N.E.2d 212, 422 Mass. 1002, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reddy-v-commonwealth-mass-1996.