Reddy v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Reddy v. Commonwealth

662 N.E.2d 212, 422 Mass. 1002, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 57

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 19, 1996·Published

Opinion

This is an appeal under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from the denial pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.), of relief from an interlocutory ruling denying Jason C. Reddy access to the psychological and medical records of the complainant’s mother. Supreme Judicial Court Rule 2:21 (2) requires an appellant to “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” The appellant has failed to set forth reasons why normal appellate review in the event of conviction is not an adequate remedy.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from the denial pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.), of relief from an interlocutory ruling denying Jason C. Reddy access to the psychological and medical records of the complainant’s mother. Supreme Judicial Court Rule 2:21 (2) requires an appellant to “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” The appellant has failed to set forth reasons why normal appellate review in the event of conviction is not an adequate remedy.

Judgment affirmed.

Reddy v. Commonwealth, 662 N.E.2d 212, 422 Mass. 1002, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 57 (Mass. 1996).

Pincite

662 N.E.2d 212 (Reddy v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related