Reddock v. Department of Transportation

390 So. 2d 818, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18167
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 1980
DocketNo. OO-213
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 390 So. 2d 818 (Reddock v. Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reddock v. Department of Transportation, 390 So. 2d 818, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18167 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Department’s order directing the removal of appellant’s signboard near Interstate Highway 10 in Jackson County is AFFIRMED. Section 479.11, Florida Statutes (1979); Henderson Sign Service v. Dept. of Transportation, 390 So.2d 159 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). As in Henderson we do not rule on the question of compensation; rather, we remand that issue to the Department to abide the Supreme Court’s decision in La-Pointe Outdoor Advertising v. Dept. of Transportation, 382 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), cert. granted (Fla.1980).

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reddock v. Department of Transportation
406 So. 2d 1099 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
390 So. 2d 818, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reddock-v-department-of-transportation-fladistctapp-1980.