Redditt v. Wade

Fourth Circuit

Redditt v. Wade

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 4, 2006

Docket05-2130

StatusUnpublished

This text of Redditt v. Wade (Redditt v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redditt v. Wade, (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2130

LOUISE REDDITT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

DOMINIQUE HOLLIS, Louise Redditt, legal guardian; DENEISHA HOLLIS, Louise Redditt, legal guardian,

Plaintiffs,

versus

PATRICIA WADE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1275-1)

Submitted: April 12, 2006 Decided: May 4, 2006

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louise Redditt, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Louise Redditt appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) against

Defendant Patricia Wade for failure to effect service within 120

days from the filing of the complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Redditt v. Wade, No.

CA-02-1275-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 23, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI