Redditt v. Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Redditt v. Virginia

158 F. App'x 491

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2005·No. No. 05-1912·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Louise Redditt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Redditt v. Commonwealth of VA, No. CA-05-800-1-JCC (E.D.Va. Aug. 1, 2005). We also deny Redditt’s motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Louise Redditt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Redditt v. Commonwealth of VA, No. CA-05-800-1-JCC (E.D.Va. Aug. 1, 2005). We also deny Redditt’s motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Redditt v. Virginia, 158 F. App'x 491 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

158 F. App'x 491 (Redditt v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related