Redditt v. Virginia

158 F. App'x 491
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 28, 2005
DocketNo. 05-1912
StatusPublished

This text of 158 F. App'x 491 (Redditt v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redditt v. Virginia, 158 F. App'x 491 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Louise Redditt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Redditt v. Commonwealth of VA, No. CA-05-800-1-JCC (E.D.Va. Aug. 1, 2005). We also deny Redditt’s motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 F. App'x 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redditt-v-virginia-ca4-2005.