Redditt v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Redditt v. O'Brien

256 F. App'x 608

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2007·No. No. 07-7204·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jason Redditt, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Redditt v. O’Brien, No. 7:07-ev-00356-jet, 2007 WL 2220549 (W.D.Va. Aug. 1, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jason Redditt, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Redditt v. O’Brien, No. 7:07-ev-00356-jet, 2007 WL 2220549 (W.D.Va. Aug. 1, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Redditt v. O'Brien, 256 F. App'x 608 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

256 F. App'x 608 (Redditt v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related