Redditt v. Hale

Eighth Circuit

Redditt v. Hale

188 F.2d 832, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3111

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMay 15, 1951

Docket14295

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 F.2d 832 (Redditt v. Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redditt v. Hale, 188 F.2d 832, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3111 (8th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only order which is involved in this appeal is the order made by the District Court directing the entry of judgment pursuant to the mandate of this Court in the same controversy. See Redditt v. Hale, 8 Cir., 184 F.2d 443, 447.

Concededly, the order of the District Court directed the entry of the judgment required by the mandate. That court could not have done otherwise. See and compare, Thornton v. Carter, 8 Cir., 109 F.2d 316.

The question whether the proceedings in the Probate Court of Crittenden County, Arkansas, referred to in our former opinion, have been terminated, as the appellants claim, is not before us on this appeal.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI