Redding's Lessee v. M'Cubbin

1 Md. 368
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedApril 15, 1770
DocketLib. D. D. No. 16. fol. 569
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Md. 368 (Redding's Lessee v. M'Cubbin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redding's Lessee v. M'Cubbin, 1 Md. 368 (Md. 1770).

Opinion

The Provincial Court overruled the exceptions, and entered judgment upon the verdict for plaintiff.

Note. See ante, the case of Chamberlaine v. Crawford, April Term, 1770.

In the case of Talbot’s Lessee v. Smith, which was an ejectment for a tract of land called Langley, in Prince George’s County, the Provincial Court decided, that a deed offered by the plaintiff in support of his title, should not be read in evidence, because the description of the land contained in it, was materially variant and- different from the description in the declaration, where it was described by its metes, bounds, courses and distances. This case is not reported at length, because the deed could not be found.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manton v. Hoyt
43 Md. 254 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Md. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reddings-lessee-v-mcubbin-md-1770.