Redding's Lessee v. M'Cubbin

1 Md. 368
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided April 15, 1770·No. Lib. D. D. No. 16. fol. 569·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Provincial Court overruled the exceptions, and entered judgment upon the verdict for plaintiff.

Note. See ante, the case of Chamberlaine v. Crawford, April Term, 1770.

In the case of Talbot’s Lessee v. Smith, which was an ejectment for a tract of land called Langley, in Prince George’s County, the Provincial Court decided, that a deed offered by the plaintiff in support of his title, should not be read in evidence, because the description of the land contained in it, was materially variant and- different from the description in the declaration, where it was described by its metes, bounds, courses and distances. This case is not reported at length, because the deed could not be found.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Redding's Lessee v. M'Cubbin, 1 Md. 368 (Md. 1770).

1 Md. 368 (Redding's Lessee v. M'Cubbin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manton v. Hoyt
43 Md. 254 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1875)