Redding v. State

4 So. 3d 1255, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1792, 2009 WL 605381
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Redding v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 996 So. 2d 875
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 2009·No. No. 3D08-1588·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Redding v. State, 4 So. 3d 1255, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1792, 2009 WL 605381 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

4 So. 3d 1255 (Redding v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.