Redding v. Stage

146 A.2d 333, 188 Pa. Super. 195, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 578
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 9, 1958
DocketAppeal, No. 267
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 146 A.2d 333 (Redding v. Stage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redding v. Stage, 146 A.2d 333, 188 Pa. Super. 195, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 578 (Pa. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal by defendant from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Clearfield County refusing defendant’s motion to enter judgment on the pleadings. The pleadings consist of a complaint, answer, and new matter, and answer to the new matter.

Plaintiffs have filed a motion to quash the appeal on the ground that the order from which the appeal has been taken is interlocutory. Defendant filed an answer thereto.

There is no applicable statute authorizing an appeal from this interlocutory order. Our Supreme Court has set forth the controlling principles in McGee v. Singley, 382 Pa. 18, 114 A. 2d 141, and Epstein v. Kramer, 374 Pa. 112, 96 A. 2d 912.

The appeal is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Husak v. Berkel, Inc.
341 A.2d 174 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Mosebach v. Mosebach
181 A.2d 701 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 A.2d 333, 188 Pa. Super. 195, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redding-v-stage-pasuperct-1958.