Redding v. Redding

Missouri Court of Appeals

Redding v. Redding

355 S.W.3d 554, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1674, 2011 WL 6989867

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 2011

DocketWD 73652

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 355 S.W.3d 554 (Redding v. Redding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redding v. Redding, 355 S.W.3d 554, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1674, 2011 WL 6989867 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Dianna Redding appeals the circuit court’s entry of a Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc in this dissolution case. The Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc clarified that a debt secured by a piece of real property was awarded, along with the real property, to Ms. Redding. We affirm. Because a pub *555 lished opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Dianna Redding appeals the circuit court’s entry of a Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc in this dissolution case. The Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc clarified that a debt secured by a piece of real property was awarded, along with the real property, to Ms. Redding. We affirm. Because a pub *555 lished opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 S.W.3d 554, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1674, 2011 WL 6989867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redding-v-redding-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack