Redding v. Phenix City
113 So. 318, 22 Ala. App. 119, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 82
Opinion
In a prosecution for the violation of the terms of a city ordinance, except in certain specified cases, of which this is not one (Acts 1915, p. 294), it is essential that the ordinance in question, properly authenticated, be introduced in evidence. Smith v. Town of Eclectic, 18 Ala. App. 329, 92 So. 212. This was not done in this case, and for that reason the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Redding v. Phenix City, 113 So. 318, 22 Ala. App. 119, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 82 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).
113 So. 318 (Redding v. Phenix City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maxwell v. City of Mobile
439 So. 2d 714 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Felder v. City of Huntsville
168 So. 2d 490 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1964)