Redding v. Phenix City

Alabama Court of Appeals

Redding v. Phenix City

113 So. 318, 22 Ala. App. 119, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 82

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 7, 1927

Docket4 Div. 280.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 113 So. 318 (Redding v. Phenix City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redding v. Phenix City, 113 So. 318, 22 Ala. App. 119, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 82 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

In a prosecution for the violation of the terms of a city ordinance, except in certain specified cases, of which this is not one (Acts 1915, p. 294), it is essential that the ordinance in question, properly authenticated, be introduced in evidence. Smith v. Town of Eclectic, 18 Ala. App. 329, 92 So. 212. This was not done in this case, and for that reason the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

In a prosecution for the violation of the terms of a city ordinance, except in certain specified cases, of which this is not one (Acts 1915, p. 294), it is essential that the ordinance in question, properly authenticated, be introduced in evidence. Smith v. Town of Eclectic, 18 Ala. App. 329, 92 So. 212. This was not done in this case, and for that reason the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 So. 318, 22 Ala. App. 119, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redding-v-phenix-city-alactapp-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack