Reddie Houston v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 25, 2013
Docket05-13-01314-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Reddie Houston v. State (Reddie Houston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reddie Houston v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Dismiss and Opinion Filed September 25, 2013.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01314-CR

REDDIE HOUSTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-81813-06

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Lang, and Brown Opinion by Justice Moseley Reddie Houston was convicted of two counts of indecency with a child and one count of

sexual assault of a child, as alleged in one indictment. Punishment, enhanced by one prior felony

conviction, was assessed at life imprisonment on each count. Sentence was imposed in open

court on June 13, 2007. The convictions were affirmed on direct appeal. Houston v. State, No.

05-07-01049-CR, 2008 WL 4559969 (Tex. App.––Dallas 2008, no pet.) (mem. op., not

designated for publication). On September 19, 2013, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal

seeking to appeal the “judgment and sentence imposed in open court on June 13, 2007.” We

conclude we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.

“Jurisdiction concerns the power of a court to hear and determine a case.” Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). The jurisdiction of an appellate court must be legally invoked, and if not, the power of the court to act is as absent as if it did not exist. See id.

at 523. To invoke the Court’s jurisdiction, an appellant must file his notice of appeal within the

time period provided by the rules of appellate procedure. See id.; see also Slaton v. State, 981

S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (per curiam).

Appellant’s September 19, 2013 notice of appeal is untimely as to the June 13, 2007

sentencing date. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction.

/Jim Moseley/ JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 131314F.U05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

REDDIE HOUSTON, Appellant On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas No. 05-13-01314-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 366-81813-06. Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang and Brown participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 25th day of September, 2013.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reddie Houston v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reddie-houston-v-state-texapp-2013.