Reddick v. State

117 So. 510, 96 Fla. 140
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 5, 1928·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reddick v. State, 117 So. 510, 96 Fla. 140 (Fla. 1928).

117 So. 510 (Reddick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Florida Ex Rel. v. Atkinson Lasseter
146 So. 581 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
State Ex Rel. Dade County Security Co. v. Barns
128 So. 860 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)