Redden v. McMaster

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 26, 2009
• Docket: 08-8190
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8190

DANNY RUSSELL REDDEN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General; S. PRENTISS COUNTS, Assistant Attorney General; DEBORAH RJ SHUPE, Assistant Attorney General; JOHN DOE, Horry County Solicitor's Office; HAROLD W. GOWDY, III, Solicitor Seventh Judicial Circuit; MARK MORIN, Assistant Solicitor Cherokee County,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:08-cv-02845-CMC)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Russell Redden, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Danny Russell Redden appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without

prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Redden v. McMaster, No. 8:08-cv-02845-CMC

(D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED