Reddekopp v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Reddekopp v. SAIF Corp.

812 P.2d 47, 108 Or. App. 183, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1077

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 3, 1991

DocketWCB 89-09956; CA A67456

StatusPublished

This text of 812 P.2d 47 (Reddekopp v. SAIF Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reddekopp v. SAIF Corp., 812 P.2d 47, 108 Or. App. 183, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1077 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that affirmed and adopted the referee’s order that upheld SAIF’s denial of medical benefits. Claimant argues, and SAIF concedes, that the referee relied on certain medical reports that were not admitted in evidence. Because the referee’s findings and conclusions, adopted by the Board, are not based on evidence in the record, we reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that affirmed and adopted the referee’s order that upheld SAIF’s denial of medical benefits. Claimant argues, and SAIF concedes, that the referee relied on certain medical reports that were not admitted in evidence. Because the referee’s findings and conclusions, adopted by the Board, are not based on evidence in the record, we reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

812 P.2d 47, 108 Or. App. 183, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reddekopp-v-saif-corp-orctapp-1991.