Reddavide v. Laskowitz

133 A. 719, 100 N.J. Eq. 588, 15 Stock. 588, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 636
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 31, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 A. 719 (Reddavide v. Laskowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reddavide v. Laskowitz, 133 A. 719, 100 N.J. Eq. 588, 15 Stock. 588, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 636 (N.J. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Church, in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenohard, Minturkt, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Kalisch, Campbell, Heteield, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sabatino v. D'Aloise
152 A. 761 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A. 719, 100 N.J. Eq. 588, 15 Stock. 588, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reddavide-v-laskowitz-nj-1927.