Reddavide v. Laskowitz

133 A. 719, 100 N.J. Eq. 588, 15 Stock. 588, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 636
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1927·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Church, in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenohard, Minturkt, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Kalisch, Campbell, Heteield, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reddavide v. Laskowitz, 133 A. 719, 100 N.J. Eq. 588, 15 Stock. 588, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 636 (N.J. 1927).

133 A. 719 (Reddavide v. Laskowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sabatino v. D'Aloise
152 A. 761 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)