Redd v. Battisti

982 N.E.2d 91, 20 N.Y.3d 966, 958 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2012 NY Slip Op 93449, 2012 WL 6200936, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 3628
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 13, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 982 N.E.2d 91 (Redd v. Battisti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redd v. Battisti, 982 N.E.2d 91, 20 N.Y.3d 966, 958 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2012 NY Slip Op 93449, 2012 WL 6200936, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 3628 (N.Y. 2012).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the Supreme Court judgment, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument or, in the alternative, leave [967]*967to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Redd v. New York State Division of Parole
923 F. Supp. 2d 371 (E.D. New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 N.E.2d 91, 20 N.Y.3d 966, 958 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2012 NY Slip Op 93449, 2012 WL 6200936, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 3628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redd-v-battisti-ny-2012.