Redacted v. Redacted
165 A.3d 870
This text of 165 A.3d 870 (Redacted v. Redacted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Redacted v. Redacted, 165 A.3d 870 (Pa. 2014).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Permission to Appeal is GRANTED. The parties are directed to brief the following issues:
1) When counsel for a nonprofit corporation believes that charitable assets are being unlawfully diverted, may counsel disclose this information to the Attorney General’s office, as parens patriae for the public to whom the charity and its counsel owe a fiduciary duty?
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
The Application to File Under Seal is GRANTED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to establish a briefing schedule, with the direction that the matter shall be submitted on the briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
165 A.3d 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redacted-v-redacted-pa-2014.