Redacted v. Redacted

165 A.3d 870
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 30, 2014
DocketNo. 173 MM 2014
StatusPublished

This text of 165 A.3d 870 (Redacted v. Redacted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redacted v. Redacted, 165 A.3d 870 (Pa. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Permission to Appeal is GRANTED. The parties are directed to brief the following issues:

1) When counsel for a nonprofit corporation believes that charitable assets are being unlawfully diverted, may counsel disclose this information to the Attorney General’s office, as parens patriae for the public to whom the charity and its counsel owe a fiduciary duty?
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

The Application to File Under Seal is GRANTED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to establish a briefing schedule, with the direction that the matter shall be submitted on the briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 A.3d 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redacted-v-redacted-pa-2014.