Red v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Red v. State

1922 OK CR 159, 210 P. 407, 22 Okla. Crim. 97, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 23

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 21, 1922

DocketNo. A-4031.

StatusPublished

This text of 1922 OK CR 159 (Red v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Red v. State, 1922 OK CR 159, 210 P. 407, 22 Okla. Crim. 97, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 23 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Charley Red, was convicted in the county court of Payne county sitting at Cush-ing, on a charge that he did have in his possession about 15 gallons of fermented, malt, and intoxicating liquors, to wit, 15 gallons of “chock beer,” with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to' be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict on the 24th day of May, 1921, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court July 2, 1921, petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. For the reason stated,-the motion to affirm is sustained.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Charley Red, was convicted in the county court of Payne county sitting at Cush-ing, on a charge that he did have in his possession about 15 gallons of fermented, malt, and intoxicating liquors, to wit, 15 gallons of “chock beer,” with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to' be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict on the 24th day of May, 1921, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court July 2, 1921, petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. For the reason stated,-the motion to affirm is sustained.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1922 OK CR 159, 210 P. 407, 22 Okla. Crim. 97, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/red-v-state-oklacrimapp-1922.