Red Rope Industries, Inc. v. Dworkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Red Rope Industries, Inc. v. Dworkin

37 A.D.2d 928, 326 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3059

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 928 (Red Rope Industries, Inc. v. Dworkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Red Rope Industries, Inc. v. Dworkin, 37 A.D.2d 928, 326 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 11, [929]*9291971, denying defendants’ motion to vacate a preliminary injunction which had been granted on September 2, 1969, upon a showing that defendant, Howard Dworkin, violated the contractual restrictive covenant which forms the basis of plaintiff’s action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the motion granted, and the preliminary injunction vacated. The restrictive covenant, which was the basis for the preliminary injunction expired, by its terms, on March 22, 1971, and a preliminary injunction could not be judicially extended beyond that date by Special Term. (See Mixing Equip. Co. v. Philadelphia Gear, 436 F. 2d 1308, 1315.) Concur ■— Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Nunez, Kupferman and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 11, [929]*9291971, denying defendants’ motion to vacate a preliminary injunction which had been granted on September 2, 1969, upon a showing that defendant, Howard Dworkin, violated the contractual restrictive covenant which forms the basis of plaintiff’s action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the motion granted, and the preliminary injunction vacated. The restrictive covenant, which was the basis for the preliminary injunction expired, by its terms, on March 22, 1971, and a preliminary injunction could not be judicially extended beyond that date by Special Term. (See Mixing Equip. Co. v. Philadelphia Gear, 436 F. 2d 1308, 1315.) Concur ■— Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Nunez, Kupferman and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 928, 326 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/red-rope-industries-inc-v-dworkin-nyappdiv-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack