Red Line Commercial Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Red Line Commercial Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 847, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1358

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 21, 1966

DocketNo. R66/40; No. R66/41; No. R66/42; No. R66/43

StatusPublished

This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 847 (Red Line Commercial Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Red Line Commercial Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 847, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1358 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in International Packers, Limited v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 636, Reap. Dec. 11147) and International Packers, Limited v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696), the court found and held that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the canned meat exported from Argentina, during the period January 1,1959, through December 31, 1959, described on the invoices of the entries covered by the appeals for reappraisement recited in schedule “A,” and that such values per dozen tins, net packed, are the respective values shown as plaintiffs’ claimed values on schedule “B,” for the respective products and sizes of container described on the invoices and as stated in each entry and recited in said schedule “B,” during those periods which correspond to the time of exportation of the canned meat covered by the appeals for reappraisement recited in schedule “A,” which with schedule “B,” was attached to and made a part of the decisions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in International Packers, Limited v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 636, Reap. Dec. 11147) and International Packers, Limited v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696), the court found and held that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the canned meat exported from Argentina, during the period January 1,1959, through December 31, 1959, described on the invoices of the entries covered by the appeals for reappraisement recited in schedule “A,” and that such values per dozen tins, net packed, are the respective values shown as plaintiffs’ claimed values on schedule “B,” for the respective products and sizes of container described on the invoices and as stated in each entry and recited in said schedule “B,” during those periods which correspond to the time of exportation of the canned meat covered by the appeals for reappraisement recited in schedule “A,” which with schedule “B,” was attached to and made a part of the decisions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Cust. Ct. 847, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/red-line-commercial-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack