Red Coral Corporation v. Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC

• Court: District Court, Northern Mariana Islands
• Decided: February 11, 2021
• Docket: 1:20-cv-00016
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

FILED Clerk District Court 1 FEB 11 2021 FOR THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS By 3 (D érk) RED CORAL CORPORATION, Case No. 1:20-CV-00016 5 we Petitioner, 6 VS. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING 7 IMPERIAL PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT (CNMI), LLC 8 Respondent. 9 10 On July 29, 2020, Petitioner Red Coral Corporation (“Red Coral”) petitioned this Court to 11 compel Respondent Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC (“IPI”) to submit to binding 12 3 arbitration in accordance with an arbitration clause within the parties’ residential lease agreement.

(ECF No. 1). Pursuant to their stipulated motion (ECF No. 2), the Court ordered the parties to

15 || participate in arbitration no later than 45 days following the entry of this Court’s order entered on 16 || September 3, 2020 (Order, ECF No. 3). The Court also dismissed the case and directed closure of 17 || the case, but retained jurisdiction “to enforce any award, settlement or judgment issued from the 18 || aforementioned arbitration or to provide any other Orders as this Court deems appropriate to the +9 disposition of this matter” as stipulated by the parties. (Order at 2.) 2° About five months later, on February 10, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation “that judgment 21 may be entered in favor of [Red Coral] against [IPI], for the total sum of $150,000.00, and together 22 with interest on the total at a rate of 9% per annum from the date thereof.” While the Court is left 23 unaware as to the outcome of the arbitration or whether the parties did in fact arbitrate, the Court 24 nonetheless finds that entry of judgment in accordance with the parties’ stipulated agreement is 25 appropriate. Furthermore, an award of post-judgment interest at the parties’ contractual rate of 9 Page 1 of 2

1 || percent instead of the statutory rate mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 is appropriate here because of 2 parties’ express agreement to specifically apply a post-interest judgment rate at a specific > |! amount. See Fidelity Fed. Bank, FSB y. Durga Ma Corp., 387 F.3d 1021, 1023 (9th Cir. 2004) (“An exception to § 1961 exists when the parties contractually agree to waive its application.”); ° Citicorp Real Estate, Inc. v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1097, 1107-08 (1998) (concluding that the parties ° contractually waived their right to have post-judgment interest calculated at the federal statutory rate where the parties stipulated to a ten-percent interest rate “to the date of entry of judgment and, after judgment until collection.”) (emphasis in original); cf. Oreo Corp. v. Winnerman, 642

F.App’x 751, 755 (9th Cir. 2016) (concluding that the district court abused its discretion on

awarding post-interest judgment at the parties’ contractual rate when there was no “specific 12 agreement” “on this specific issue” of post-judgment interest). 13 Based on the foregoing, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ Stipulation for Judgment 14 ||(ECF No. 5). The Clerk of Court is ordered to enter Judgment in favor of Red Coral Corporation 15 || against Imperial Pacific International (CNMD, LLC in the amount of One Hundred Fifty Thousand |! Dollars ($150,000.00 USD), plus post-judgment interest at a rate of 9% per annum. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of February, 2021. 18

20 RAMONA V..MANGLONA Chief Judge 21 22 23 24 25

Page 2 of 2