Red Cloud Tribe v. Wilson

178 S.E. 685, 164 Va. 178, 1935 Va. LEXIS 192
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedMarch 14, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 178 S.E. 685 (Red Cloud Tribe v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Red Cloud Tribe v. Wilson, 178 S.E. 685, 164 Va. 178, 1935 Va. LEXIS 192 (Va. 1935).

Opinion

Epes, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action (instituted by notice of motion for judgment) brought by Bertha M. Wilson against Red Cloud Tribe, Number 58, Improved Order of Red Men of Messick, York county, Virginia. The parties are referred to as they appeared in the court below.

The plaintiff is the widow of Howard Wilson who, at the time of his death and for several years prior to that time, was a member of the defendant association.

The defendant (to which we shall hereafter refer as the Tribe), a fraternal benefit society, is an unincorporated association,1 which is a subordinate lodge of the “Great Council of Virginia of the Improved Order of Red Men,” a Virginia corporation, which, as stated in its constitution, “exists by virtue of a charter granted it. by the Great Council of the United States of the Improved Order of Red Men.” One of the objects of this order and this Tribe is to afford limited insurance benefits payable by the tribe to its members.

The purpose of the action is to recover from the defendant a sum arrived at by multiplying $2 by the number of members of the defendant order in good standing at the time of the death of Howard Wilson, to which the plaintiff claims to be entitled under the benefit provisions of section 5, article VI, of the by-laws of the defendant.

By agreement a trial by jury was waived and all questions of fact and law were submitted to the decision of the court. Being of opinion that the plaintiff was entitled to recover and that at the time of Howard Wilson’s death the defendant [181]*181had 414 members in good standing, the court entered judgment for the plaintiff for $828, with interest from October 10, 1932. To this judgment the defendant has been granted a writ of error.

The first assignment of error is that the court erred in holding that, upon the facts proven, the plaintiff was entitled under the by-laws of the order to recover.

There is no material conflict in the evidence, and the important facts are as follows: On August 27, 1932, Howard Wilson, the husband of the plaintiff, was injured in an automobile accident. After being in a hospital for two weeks he was taken to his home in York county, where he died on September 24, 1932, as the direct result of his injuries.

At the time he was injured he was indebted to the Tribe in the sum of $2.10 for dues and assessments for the three months ending June 30, 1932. On September 23, 1932, his stepmother, Mrs. Alice Wilson, paid for him to E. L. Forrest, the regular collector for the Tribe (called “Collector of Wampum”) $2.10 in full settlement of Wilson’s dues and assessments for the three months ending June 30, 1932, and $1.80 for his dues and assessments for the three months ending September 30, 1932. For these payments official receipts of the Tribe were given. Wilson died the following day (September 24th) about 8:30 p. m.

When these payments were made Wilson believed he was going to get well, as did his wife and his stepmother; and when Forrest received these payments he knew that Wilson was sick as a result of injuries received in this accident.

The Tribe held a meeting every Saturday night. During the early part of the regular meeting held September 24, 1932, someone came in and said that Howard Wilson was dead. Shortly after this Forrest stated to the meeting that Wilson’s dues had been paid; and at the close of the meeting he reported the total dues collected by him since the last meeting, which included the amounts paid by Wilson, and the whole amount reported by him was accepted by the meeting.

No action was taken to return Wilson’s dues until at the [182]*182meeting of the Tribe held on November 19, 1932 (the eighth after Wilson’s death). At this meeting a motion was made and carried to “refund Mr. Howard Wilson’s dues for quarters June and September, to be paid to Mrs. Alice Wilson.” In accordance with this resolution a check was sent to Mrs. Wilson for the $3.90 which she had paid for Howard Wilson. She endorsed the check and turned it over to Mrs. Bertha Wilson (the plaintiff), who promptly returned the check to the Tribe.

No claim was made by Howard Wilson during his lifetime or is here being made for sick benefits. The Tribe has not paid and no claim is here being made for the $40 which section 4 of article VI of the by-laws of the Tribe prqvides shall be paid to help defray the funeral expenses of a member who dies while in good standing.

The Tribe issues no policy of insurance and the pertinent by-laws of the Tribe constitute the contract of insurance between the Tribe and its members. It is also pertinent to note that the insurance benefits are not payable by the superior or grand lodge but are payable by the local tribe.

“General laws and rules of order for the government of tribes under its jurisdiction” were adopted and promulgated in January, 1923, by the “Great Council of Virginia of the Improved Order of Red Men.” These laws we shall hereafter refer to as “General Laws for Tribes.”

Section 134 of “General Laws for Tribes” provides that “the Tribe shall adopt by-laws in accordance with these laws.” The “by-laws” adopted by the Red Cloud Tribe bear unmistakable internal evidence of having been adopted in pursuance of the grand lodge’s “General Laws for Tribes,” and by section 7 of article XV of the Tribe’s by-laws sections 53-58 of the “General Laws for Tribes” are by reference incorporated verbatim in the Tribe’s by-laws. In a similar manner many other sections of the “General Laws for Tribes” are incorporated by reference in the by-laws of the Tribe. It is plain that the by-laws of the Tribe were intended to be and must be interpreted in the light of the provisions of the “General Laws for Tribes,” the pertinent sec[183]*183tions of which are quoted in the footnote.2 In quoting sections of the “General Laws for Tribes” and of the by-laws of the Tribe we insert in brackets the interpretation given some of the order’s idioms in the glossary printed as an appendix to the “Constitution and General Laws.”

The pertinent sections of the “By-laws of Red Cloud Tribe, No. 58,” read:

[184]*184“Article V.—Dues, Fines and Assessments

“Section 1.—Every member of this Tribe shall be required to pay into the wampum belt of this Tribe as dues from the time of adoption, re-instatement or admittance to membership herein one fathom, and fifty inches ($1.50) as quarterly dues, the same with all fines and assessments to be paid on or before the last council sleep in March, June, [185]*185September and December, or within one council sleep thereafter.3

“Sec. 2.—On the death of a member in good standing; two fathoms ($2) shall be paid by each member of this tribe to sustain the funds of this tribe.

“Article VI.—Benefits

“Section 1.—Every member of this tribe, as required by the Constitution and By-Laws, shall not receive any benefits for the first seven suns’ sickness or disability, but shall receive three fathoms ($3) for each seven suns’ sickness or disability thereafter, for thirteen seven suns.”

“Sec.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodmen of World Life Insurance Society v. Grant
38 S.E.2d 450 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1946)
Jones v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of America
15 F. Supp. 1077 (S.D. Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 S.E. 685, 164 Va. 178, 1935 Va. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/red-cloud-tribe-v-wilson-va-1935.