Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Southern Conference of Teamsters

Court of Appeals of Texas

Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Southern Conference of Teamsters

358 S.W.2d 955, 50 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2585, 1962 Tex. App. LEXIS 2590

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 7, 1962

Docket4005

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 358 S.W.2d 955 (Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Southern Conference of Teamsters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Southern Conference of Teamsters, 358 S.W.2d 955, 50 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2585, 1962 Tex. App. LEXIS 2590 (Tex. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

The Southern Conference of Teamsters, as plaintiffs, brought this suit to declare null and void a certain collective bargaining agreement entered into by the defendants Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc., and the Union of Transportation Employees, Inc. The Trial Court granted the relief sought. Both defendants appealed and the cause is pending for disposition. On 27 April 1962 appellee (plaintiff) filed motion to dismiss appellants’ (defendants’) appeal on the ground that the appeal was moot, inasmuch as the collective bargaining agreement declared void by the Trial Court had, during pendency of the appeal, expired by its own terms, and a new collective bargaining agreement had been entered into by defendants which is not subject to the complaints of plaintiff, as was the original agreement.

Thereafter, both defendants filed motions to dismiss the entire case rather than dismissing the appeal only.

When a case has become moot, the proper order to be entered by the appellate court is one dismissing the case, and not one dismissing the appeal. To dismiss the appeal would leave undisturbed the judgment of the lower court, and thereby in effect, affirm same without according to the appealing parties a hearing on the merits of their appeal. International Ass’n. of Machinists Local Union No. 1488 et al. v. Federal Ass’n of Accessory Workers et al., 133 Tex. 624, 130 S.W.2d 282, 283.

Accordingly, defendants’ motions to dismiss this cause are granted. Costs are taxed l/z each against appellee and the two appellants.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

The Southern Conference of Teamsters, as plaintiffs, brought this suit to declare null and void a certain collective bargaining agreement entered into by the defendants Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc., and the Union of Transportation Employees, Inc. The Trial Court granted the relief sought. Both defendants appealed and the cause is pending for disposition. On 27 April 1962 appellee (plaintiff) filed motion to dismiss appellants’ (defendants’) appeal on the ground that the appeal was moot, inasmuch as the collective bargaining agreement declared void by the Trial Court had, during pendency of the appeal, expired by its own terms, and a new collective bargaining agreement had been entered into by defendants which is not subject to the complaints of plaintiff, as was the original agreement.

Thereafter, both defendants filed motions to dismiss the entire case rather than dismissing the appeal only.

When a case has become moot, the proper order to be entered by the appellate court is one dismissing the case, and not one dismissing the appeal. To dismiss the appeal would leave undisturbed the judgment of the lower court, and thereby in effect, affirm same without according to the appealing parties a hearing on the merits of their appeal. International Ass’n. of Machinists Local Union No. 1488 et al. v. Federal Ass’n of Accessory Workers et al., 133 Tex. 624, 130 S.W.2d 282, 283.

Accordingly, defendants’ motions to dismiss this cause are granted. Costs are taxed l/z each against appellee and the two appellants.

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 S.W.2d 955, 50 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2585, 1962 Tex. App. LEXIS 2590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/red-ball-motor-freight-inc-v-southern-conference-of-teamsters-texapp-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack