Rector v. Alcorn

41 So. 370, 88 Miss. 788
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1906·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Calhoon, B.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Erom an examination of the entire will of Governor Alcorn, which the reporter will publish in full, we do not take the view that the words in reference to Mrs. Alcorn are precatory. If they are construed as not merely expressions of confidence in her acting wisely, but as imperative to control her as trustee, it seems to us the whole purpose, as indicated by the language used in reference to her, to make independent provision for her, is defeated. The contentions on both sides are so lucidly and fully put that we need only say that we agree with the authorities produced by the appellee.

Affirmed on appeal and cross-appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rector v. Alcorn, 41 So. 370, 88 Miss. 788 (Mich. 1906).

41 So. 370 (Rector v. Alcorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LANHAM v. Howell
49 So. 2d 701 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1951)
Alcorn v. Alcorn
194 F. 275 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Mississippi, 1911)