Record Holding Co. v. New York Fire Insurance

177 A. 87, 114 N.J.L. 274, 29 Gummere 274, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 228
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Record Holding Co. v. New York Fire Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 N.J. Misc. 687
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 10, 1935·Published

Opinion

*275 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Record Holding Co. v. New York Fire Insurance, 177 A. 87, 114 N.J.L. 274, 29 Gummere 274, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 228 (N.J. 1935).

177 A. 87 (Record Holding Co. v. New York Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.