Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Gossett

111 S.W.2d 1066, 130 Tex. 535, 1938 Tex. LEXIS 197
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 12, 1938
DocketNo. 7302.
StatusPublished
Cited by36 cases

This text of 111 S.W.2d 1066 (Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Gossett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Gossett, 111 S.W.2d 1066, 130 Tex. 535, 1938 Tex. LEXIS 197 (Tex. 1938).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Sharp

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This proceeding involves construction of a certain income debenture issued by the Guaranty Bond State Bank, of Miles, Texas, to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.

Relator, Reconstruction Finance Corporation, seeks a writ of mandamus against respondent, Z. Gossett, in his capacity as Banking Commissioner and as statutory receiver for the Guaranty Bond State Bank, of Miles, Texas, to compel the Banking Commissioner to pay the sum of $13,253.75 to the relator, to be applied on its indebtedness evidenced by the proof of claim filed with and approved by the respondent. The record consists of relator’s sworn petition and respondent’s sworn answer, which disclose that the facts are undisputed, and only questions of law are presented to this Court for determination.

During the late depression the Federal Government greatly enlarged its field of activity in extending financial aid to certain business interests. The Reconstruction Finance Corporation was one of the governmental agencies created for that purpose. This form of debenture was part of the program originated by the Federal Government, through this corporation, to assist banks and avoid, if possible, the disastrous results of a widespread depression. The debenture is quite lengthy, and frequently refers to the various sections thereof, and in order to get the intention of the parties expressed in such instrument, it is necessary to set out verbatim most of the sections contained therein. As to the others, we shall merely summarize their contents.

The Guaranty Bond State Bank will be designated as Bank, Reconstruction Finance Corporation as relator, and Z. Gossett as respondent.

This debenture is dated January 23, 1934, and begins with the statement that the Bank “hereby promises to pay to Recon *537 struction Finance Corporation, or registered assigns, on August 1, 1953, at the principal office of the Bank in the city of Miles, Texas, the principal amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,-000), and to pay to the registered holder hereof interest on said principal amount, but only in accordance with the provisions set forth below, payable semi-annually at said office on each February 1 and August 1, from the date of this debenture at the rate of five per cent per annum and no more.”

Section 1 treats of the authority of the Bank to issue such $50,000.00 debenture, and to incur other indebtedness under the restrictions contained therein.

We quote from the debenture the following sections:

“2. Current interest due only if earned. — Until the Debentures shall become and be due and payable, whether at maturity or by declaration or call for redemption, or otherwise, no interest shall become or be due and payable upon the Debentures unless and except to the extent that, as provided in section 5 hereof, the net profits of the Bank accruing after the date of the Debentures shall suffice for such payment: Provided, however, That nothing herein contained shall be deemed to prevent payments of or on account of such interest from any funds of the Bank, if the Board of Directors of the Bank so determines, provided that the sum of—

“(a) The aggregate principal amount of the Debentures at the time outstanding,

“(b) The aggregate principal amount of all indebtedness of the Bank at the time outstanding, if any, subordinated to the Debentures as to payment of principal and interest, and

“(c) The then unimpaired capital, surplus, and undivided profits of the Bank exceeds $105,000 by an amount at least equal to the interest proposed to be paid.

“3. Determination of net profits. — The net profits (or net loss) of the Bank shall be determined for each six months’ period ending on December 31 or June 30, by deducting from the gross earnings from all sources for such period—

“(a) All expenses for such period;

“(b) All interest accrued during such period except interest on the Debentures and on indebtedness, if any, subordinated to the Debentures as to payment of principal and interest;

“(c) All losses realized during such period, and such charge-offs and write-downs of assets for the period and such transfers for the period to reserves (whether from income, undivided profits, or surplus) as in each case may be reasonably necessary to make proper provision for doubtful assets, depreciation, and *538 unrealized losses, including all charge-offs, write-downs, and transfers to reserves requested during the period by the State authority exercising supervision over the Bank;

“(d) Provision for all taxes for such period, including taxes measured by income and taxes based on the ownership of stock in the Bank paid or payable by the Bank for the account of its shareholders, without prejudice to such right as the Bank may have to recover the same;

“(e) Such transfers for such period to surplus as may be required by law; and

“(f) The net loss, if any, determined in accordance with the provisions of this section 3, accrued since the date of the Debentures, accumulated to and existing at the beginning of such period.

“All recoveries over net-book value on assets previously charged off or written.down or against which reserves have been set up, and all transfers from reserves to surplus or undivided profits (other than transfers made to reflect recoveries already treated as gross earnings), shall be considered gross earnings for the respective periods during which such recoveries or transfers are effected. Upon the request (contained in one or more instruments of substantially similar tenor) of the registered holders of at least twenty-five per cent in aggregate principal amount of the Debentures at the time outstanding, the Bank will permit the duly authorized representatives of such holders to examine all records of the Bank for the purpose of verifying the determination of the net profits (or net loss) of the Bank for any such period.

“4. Unpaid interest to accrue. — Interest on the Debentures shall accrue from the date thereof, so that, if and to the extent that interest on any Debenture from such date at the full rate specified above, whether or not due and payable under the provisions of section 5 hereof, shall not have been paid (interest so unpaid to any given date, accrued from day to day, being herein termed ‘accrued and unpaid interest’), such accrued and unpaid interest shall in any event become and be due and payable on such Debenture (or any portion of the principal amount thereof) whenever such Debenture (or such portion) shall become or be due and payable, whether at maturity, or by declaration or call for redemption, or otherwise.

“5. Application of net profits and payment of interest. — As long as any of the Debentures are outstanding, the Bank on each February 1 and August 1 shall apply its net profits for the six-months’ period ending on the next preceding December 31 or June 30, as the case may be, to the following purposes and in the following order of priority, and not otherwise: - -

*539 “First:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dynamic CRM v. UMA Education
31 F.4th 914 (Fifth Circuit, 2022)
Hous. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Tex. Workforce Comm'n
574 S.W.3d 634 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019)
Robert Hovel and Tania Hovel v. Gal Batzri
490 S.W.3d 132 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 2007
Opinion No.
Texas Attorney General Reports, 2007
Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Knott
128 S.W.3d 211 (Texas Supreme Court, 2003)
Hurt v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
354 F.3d 372 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
Emscor Manufacturing, Inc. v. Alliance Insurance Group
879 S.W.2d 894 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Wilburn v. State
824 S.W.2d 755 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Burnett v. Chase Oil & Gas, Inc.
700 S.W.2d 737 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Schuenemann
668 S.W.2d 324 (Texas Supreme Court, 1984)
Hanks v. GAB Business Services, Inc.
626 S.W.2d 564 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Texas Industrial Accident Board v. Allstate Insurance Co.
570 S.W.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Ingle Bros. Pacific, Inc. v. Scott
478 S.W.2d 210 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Sisk v. Parker
469 S.W.2d 727 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Alkire v. Dugan Drug Stores, Inc.
468 S.W.2d 492 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Neff v. Ulmer
404 S.W.2d 644 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
McLean v. Hillman
352 S.W.2d 310 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.W.2d 1066, 130 Tex. 535, 1938 Tex. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reconstruction-finance-corp-v-gossett-tex-1938.