Reclamation District No. 70 v. Blackmer

113 P. 174, 159 Cal. 801, 1911 Cal. LEXIS 386
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 10, 1911
DocketSac. No. 1785, Sac. No. 1786, Sac. No. 1787, Sac. No. 1788, Sac. No. 1789, Sac. No. 1790, Sac. No. 1791, Sac. No. 1792, Sac. No. 1793, Sac. No. 1794.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 P. 174 (Reclamation District No. 70 v. Blackmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reclamation District No. 70 v. Blackmer, 113 P. 174, 159 Cal. 801, 1911 Cal. LEXIS 386 (Cal. 1911).

Opinion

It having been stipulated that decisions in the above entitled cases should depend upon the decision in Reclamation District No.70 v. John Birks (Sac. No. 1784), ante, p. 233, [113 P. 170], this day decided, and that such judgment of this court as might be made and given in the case of Reclamation District No. 70 v.John Birks (Sac. No. 1784), ante, p. 233, [113 P. 170], should also be given in the above entitled cases.

It is ordered as to the above entitled cases, and each of them, that the judgment and order appealed from be reversed.

Hearing in Bank of each of above entitled cases respectively denied.

Beatty, C.J., dissented from the respective orders denying a hearing in Bank of each of above entitled cases.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 P. 174, 159 Cal. 801, 1911 Cal. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reclamation-district-no-70-v-blackmer-cal-1911.