Reclamation Dist. No. 70 v. Blackmer
This text of 159 Cal. 801 (Reclamation Dist. No. 70 v. Blackmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It having been stipulated that decisions in the above entitled cases should depend upon the decision in Reclamation District No. 70 v. John Birks (Sac. No. 1784), ante, p. 233, [113 Pac. 170], this day decided, and that such judgment of this court as might be made and given in the case of Reclamation District No. 70 v. John Birks (Sac. No. 1784), ante, p. 233, [113 Pac. 170], should also be given in the above entitled cases.
It is ordered as to the above entitled cases, and each of them, that the judgment and order appealed from be reversed.
Hearing in Bank of each of above entitled eases respectively denied.
Beatty, C. J., dissented from the respective orders denying a hearing in Bank of each of above entitled cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 Cal. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reclamation-dist-no-70-v-blackmer-cal-1911.