Reckler v. Quinn

255 A.D. 873, 7 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5721
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1938·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

— Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. The petitioner applied for a license to operate a retail liquor store. His application was denied by the unanimous decision of the New York city alcoholic beverage control board and by the State liquor Authority on the ground that public convenience will not be served by granting a license. Determination unanimously confirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The determination was not unreasonable or arbitrary. Furthermore, we think that in the circumstances shown here there is no right to a judicial review of the actions of the boards. (Alcoholic Bev. Control Law, § 121; Matter of Calvary Pres. Ch. v. State Liquor Authority, 249 App. Div. 288; affd., 275 N. Y. 552; Matter of Bakeman v. Mulrooney, 243 App. Div. 650.) Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reckler v. Quinn, 255 A.D. 873, 7 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 873 (Reckler v. Quinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v. State Liquor Authority
29 A.D.2d 358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Bohlinger
284 A.D. 110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Astrab v. O'Connell
274 A.D. 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Casciato v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission
185 P.2d 246 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1947)
Sussman v. Nappy
186 Misc. 139 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Roden v. New York State Liquor Authority
258 A.D. 1076 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)