Reckler v. Quinn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reckler v. Quinn

254 A.D. 710, 4 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7218

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 710 (Reckler v. Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reckler v. Quinn, 254 A.D. 710, 4 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

The petitioner filed an application for a liquor license with the New York city alcoholic beverage control board which the latter declined to accept, acting under the authority of a rule made by the State Liquor Authority. This proceeding was brought under the provisions of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, as added by Laws of 1937, chapter 526, in effect September 1, 1937, to obtain relief in the nature of mandamus to compel the local board to accept the application. The right of the petitioner for the relief asked is definitely settled. (Fulton Restaurant, Inc., v. Quinn, 253 App. Div. 740; Matter of Wilson v. Quinn, Id. 403; affd., 277 N. Y. 720.) Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner filed an application for a liquor license with the New York city alcoholic beverage control board which the latter declined to accept, acting under the authority of a rule made by the State Liquor Authority. This proceeding was brought under the provisions of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, as added by Laws of 1937, chapter 526, in effect September 1, 1937, to obtain relief in the nature of mandamus to compel the local board to accept the application. The right of the petitioner for the relief asked is definitely settled. (Fulton Restaurant, Inc., v. Quinn, 253 App. Div. 740; Matter of Wilson v. Quinn, Id. 403; affd., 277 N. Y. 720.) Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 710, 4 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reckler-v-quinn-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack