Recke v. Manhattan Railway Co.

38 N.Y.S. 1148, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 872

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are not in all respects the same as they were in the Otten Case, lately decided by this court (37 N. Y. Supp. 982), but the principle upon which the reversal in the latter case proceeded is applicable to these facts. The variations are not sufficiently important to affect the result. The judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Recke v. Manhattan Railway Co., 38 N.Y.S. 1148, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

38 N.Y.S. 1148 (Recke v. Manhattan Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Otten v. Manhattan Railway Co.
2 A.D. 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)