Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Recio v. State

Recio v. State

96 So. 3d 1098, 2012 WL 3826204, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14849
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 5, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-3980
StatusPublished

This text of 96 So. 3d 1098 (Recio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Recio v. State, 96 So. 3d 1098, 2012 WL 3826204, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14849 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant is cautioned against future motions, petitions or appeals raising the same challenges to his sentence in this case. Such attempts will result in referral to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary procedures which may include forfeiture of gain time, see § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat., and issuance of an order to show cause why further sanctions barring pro se filings should not be imposed as well under State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48-49 (Fla.1999).

MAY, C.J., GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 3d 1098, 2012 WL 3826204, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/recio-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.